Newly updated July 18, 2017:

THE MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CASE FILING: JULY 18, 2017
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO PENAL CODE SECTION 1473,  
(biased on changes of the law both in federal courts and in the state of California by providing a new remedy in reducing the burden of proof, which assist the wrongfully convicted innocent prisoners like Hooman to obtain justice and their freedom).

Truly, God works in miraculous ways.

The most recent 03/09/2016 case filing (“Reply Brief”) on Hooman Ashkan Panah’s behalf by his federal attorneys in the US. Court of appeals for the Ninth Circuit,
Case NO. 13-99010, (Death-Penalty Case). The case has been fully Briefed, pending review and decision by the Merits Panel. (Also see his attorney’s letters to the Iranian government dated April 01, 2016 and October 09, 2015; and, to the innocence project dated December 16, 2011). For the viewer’s ease of understanding, the following specific pages: “Introduction”, 13-19, 23-32; are a condensed version of legal arguments which summarize the crux of his rebuttal evidence, and, defense. Hooman greatly appreciates all positive, helpful and constructive comments you may like to share in furtherance of justice and his exoneration and freedom. Thank you and God Bless!

Updated links in support of the written contents herein:

December 16, 2011 Letter by attorney Mr. Mark Drozdowski (Federal Public Defender) describing case fact and evidence that establish Hooman’s innocence.

October 09, 2015 Letter by attorney Mr. Joseph Trigilio (Federal Public Defender) describing case fact and evidence that establish Hooman’s innocence.

April 01, 2016 Letter by attorney Mr. Joseph Trigilio (Federal Public Defender) describing case fact and evidence that establish Hooman’s innocence.

Forensic Analytical DNA report – Calandro February 27, 2004

Forensic Analytical DNA report – Petersen Inman May 25, 2006

Dr. Michael Baden’s statement on victim’s death April 1, 2004

Robert Sheahen Trial Attorney’s letter February 24, 1994

Patrick Couwenberg Trial Prosecutor Year 2001

Ahmad Reza Seihoon November 22, 1993

APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF March 9, 2016

  Message for the viewer from Hooman’s mother, Mehri Monfared

At trial Police and Prosecutors deliberately changed the time of Nicole Parker’s disappearance (from 11:15 am. To 11:45 am.-12:00 Noon)

November 21, 1994 (Page 1024) Pretrial court transcript, where Hooman from the outset asked and insisted from the Judge to conduct “D.N.A Tests”, in order to prove his innocence

 Police report of witness Mr. Neil’s statements that Nicole Parker was seen alive, the day after prosecutor’s wrongly claimed to be the date of her death